
Nick Bete
The Scope Gallente Federation
211
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 21:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
And yet Capt. Farel you choose to continue the verbal jabs back and forth so, who's really the winner here? I think Capt. Rella and Shaman Starfire pretty much did. By keeping the banter going you've shown how easy it is to get under your skin. You realize that they'll continue just to get a response which only makes you look silly?
So much for your supposed superiority.
On topic though, I feel the Federal government should release the information they have with the Republic. It says more about us how we've treated our Matari allies than it does about their understandable reactions. We should maintain jurisdiction but, what would it hurt to have a joint investigation and consultations regarding a trial and possible punishment? |

Nick Bete
The Scope Gallente Federation
211
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 21:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
Argoist Zxim wrote:Thought I'd put this out there.
The lack of information shared on the the Federation's part may simply be to protect the integrity of an investigation into the perps terrorist connections.
The lack of transparency is understandably upsetting to some, but lets take a logical, rational approach to this.
If the federation were to share sensitive information before the investigation is complete, it would only take one person somewhere along the line sharing information (persons-of-interest, possible leads) with someone they shouldn't to catastrophically damage the whole exercise.
People who need to be questioned would be driven underground, possible additional evidence of a larger conspiracy destroyed, maybe even porvoke another attack.
All because one person (diplomat, low level security, office admin, anyone that would need to get involved to share the information with the Republic really) couldn't keep their mouth shut.
I'm not saying that the federation is right in what it is doing, because NONE of us have enough information to make that call. I'm just saying all this posturing accomplishes very little, especially if they DO have a good reason to keep this under wraps.
Valid points but, why not just come out and say that releasing information at this point could damage the investigation, if that's the case, rather than total silence? |